| main page |
welcome |
portals |
site map |
other articles |
| links |
"Through the eyes of..." |
cultural venues |
Naples history |
museums |
| main
index
map & tour of the historic center of
Naples |
||||
|
entry June 2006 Poggioreale —Paradise Lost I mean, really lost.
Strange—that name. “Poggioreale” means
“royal hill”—clearly,
a fine hill at the foot of which one might build a residence fit for a
king.
The only well-known such seats of royalty in Naples are the
above-mentioned
Angevin fortress from 1300 and the various Bourbon royal palaces from
the
1700s, notably the Royal Palace in the
heart of the city
and the building that is now a major art
museum on the Capodimonte hill.
The name “Poggioreale” now means other things to modern Neapolitans; it
the
site of the largest cemetery in the city and the site of the largest
prison in
southern Italy; the main train station is there; it is, broadly
speaking, the
grimy and degraded industrial section of Naples (thoroughly bombed in WW2);
optimistically, however, it
is also
the location of the gleaming new Centro Direzionale, the new
Civic Center, an island of glass
and
steel skyscrapers (perhaps as close to Regained as this former paradise
will
ever get). Was there, then, ever a true royal residence in that area? Indeed, there was. The Angevins were driven
from Naples in
the early 1400s by the Aragonese, who
took over the kingdom and started
an
expansion of the city to the east, through the city walls at the Nolana
Gate
and along the slopes of what is now called the Capodimonte hill. It was
a
bucolic area and perfect for a royal residence. Such a residence, the
Villa
Poggioreale, was begun in 1487 for the ruler of Naples, Ferrante, who
ruled
from 1459 to 1494. Sources from that period speak of the villa with its
main
structures and adjacent gardens as a splendid example of the kind
usually
associated with Florentine architecture of the same period.(1) Indeed,
one of the great Renaissance architects
of the day, Lorenzo de’ Medici’s favorite,
Giuliano da
Sangallo (1443-1516), was present in Naples during part of the
construction.
There is some evidence of his participation in the final design of the
villa,
and there is direct evidence of his enthusiasm for such building in
Naples in
the form of a design he made for a spectacular new royal palace to be
built
later for the Aragonese rulers of Naples. (2) The Aragonese dynasty in Naples, however,
was short-lived.
Events in Spain fused the royal houses of Aragon and Castille into
modern Spain
in 1492; shortly thereafter, the new Spanish Empire moved into Naples
and
incorporated it as a vicerealm. Subsequent Spanish plans for the city
did not
correspond to those of the earlier rulers. The massive city-building
undertaken
in the early 1500s by Spanish viceroy Don Pedro
de Toledo was concentrated
almost
totally in the west. The eastern approaches to the city were
refortified, yes,
but Ferrante’s Villa Poggioreale now stood isolated well outside the
city
walls. Yet, a map from 1670, almost at the end of Spanish tenure, shows
it to
be not only still there, but still thriving, set amidst the still
pastoral
setting at the foot of the Capodimonte slope. (3) The economic doldrums of the late 1600s and the turbulent change of dynasty in 1700 did not encourage expansion—or even maintenance—of the city and its environs. That condition did not change noticeably until the arrival of the Bourbons in the 1730s. Their priorities, like those of the Spanish, did not involve keeping up the Villa Poggioreale; they chose, instead, to build to the east, yes, but along the coast, where there arose a string of spectacular homes for the noble classes, residences that are now historically known as the “Vesuvian villas.” Farther inland, the area at the foot of that “royal hill” —the site of the Villa Poggioreale—was left to its own devices. (It was no longer a royal residence since the Spanish and then the Bourbons had built their own such estates either inside the city—or outside, but in other directions (for example, the Bourbon Palazzo Reale at Portici on the coast, in the shadow of Vesuvius). The “decline” of the area (though not viewed
as such at the
time), started with the decision in 1762 to locate the new Santa Maria
del
Pianto cemetery in the area. For its
time, it was a very forward-looking, new and hygienic approach to
cemetery
management in Europe, one that forbade burial within city limits,
moving that
activity out of the city to one large single location. That site was
greatly
expanded in the 1830s with the addition of the adjacent Cimitero
Monumentale.
It is all now known simply as the Poggioreale Cemetery and is the
largest
cemetery complex in southern Italy. As modern as all that was, such a
move
obviously discouraged further residential building in the area, or even
maintenance of those properties that were now in a setting swiftly
becoming
less and less idyllic. Subsequent location of early industry in the
east did
not help, either. Maps of the mid-1800s do show the name “Poggioreale,”
but
show little more than tracings of where the by-then 400-year-old villa
had stood. To finish off any pastoral illusions, the
train station was
then placed in the area when railroads came of age, and subsequent
grander
stations and necessary rail yards grew as the railroad industry
expanded. Then,
the large prison of Poggioreale was located in the area in the early
1900s,
and, finally, the area was heavily bombed in WW2. So much for Italian
Renaissance architecture in that area. There is now no trace of the
villa at
all. What was presumably the main entrance of the Villa is now directly
across
the street from the entrance to the cemetery. To my own disappointment, I have not been
able to determine
exactly what happened to the place—that is, physically. Who were the
landed
gentry in the late 1700s who lived there and decided to leave because
the king
had decided to open a cemetery across the street? What was the process
by which
bits and pieces of the structure and gardens started to vanish, leading
to the
ultimate disappearance of the whole villa? As they say, more research
is
needed. Stay tuned.
(1) See J.
Leostello
da Volterra, Effemeridi delle cose fatte per il Duca di Calabria
(1484-91) cited
in. G. Filangieri di Satriano, Documenti per la storia, le arti, le
industrie delle pronvincie napoletane, Napoli, 1883-91, vol. 5, pp.
230 and
315, vol. 6, p.45. (2) See Libro di Giuliano da Sangallo, Vatican Library, Vatican, Rome. The design for the new royal palace is preserved in the collection of the Uffizzi in Florence as architectural design n. 282. (return to text) (3) The map in question is from 1670 by Alessandro Baratta, ed. Giovanni Orlandi, in the Bowinkel collection in Naples. It is reprinted piecemeal and extensively cited in Cartografia della Citta’ di Napoli , by Cesare de’ Seta, edizioni scientifiche italiane, Naples, 1969. The illustration in this article is from that map, reprinted in Le citta’ nella storia d’Italia, Napoli, by Cesare de’ Seta. (1981) Rome-Bari: Laterza ed. (return to text) ---
additional reading on the Villa
Poggioreale--- Ackerman, J.S. (1963). “Sources of the Renaissance Villa,” in Studies in Western Art. Acts of the XXth International Congress of History of Art. Princeton. Blunt, Anthony (1975) Neapolitan Baroque & Rococo Architecture. London. Hersey,
George L.H. (1969) Alfonso II
and the Artistic
renewal of Naples 1485-95. New
Haven and London: Yale University
Press. to main index to history portal to portal for urban planning |